Aesthetics of Coherence in Politological Thought: Engaging Impredicativity

Simon Labrecque

Abstract


This essay approaches possible relationships between the fields of politological thought and logic. First, I claim that the logical problem of impredicativity (of self-referencing definitions, or of concepts that apply to themselves) offers a thought provoking site for unfolding a series of practical demands placed on students of politics (e.g. not presupposing your conclusions). Engaging this site in political and politological terms prompts a complex account of what goes on in logic, an alleged stronghold of coherence. This is significant insofar as self-described critical students of politics tend to hold fast to a simplified account of what logic is about, and quickly dismiss it as incoherent and violent. Second, trying to further texture what it can mean to take logic into account, I claim that the propositions formulated by Alfred North Whitehead on the interweaving of logical and aesthetic problems are relevant for apprehending the stakes of in/coherence at the time of writing. As two fields of "fundamental research," I think that logic and politological thought face similar challenges, especially in the form of the market-driven imperatives of productivity and usefulness. I propose that scholars working in those fields (and others) seriously consider possibilities of alliances.

Full Text:

HTML

Comments on this article

View all comments




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
EISSN 1925-525X
University of Victoria

The views and opinions expressed in papers and articles published in Peninsula : a journal of relational politics are those of their author(s) only and do not reflect the views and opinions of the members of the editorial board, editors, publishers or University of Victoria.