Table of Contents
| Full Issue | April 1984 | |
| J.L. Ackrill, Aristotle the Philosopher Reviewed by |
|
| Mohan Matthen | 47-49 |
| Theodor W. Adorno, Against Epistemology: A Metacritique. Studies in Husserl and the Phenomenological Antinomies Reviewed by |
|
| Lambert Zuidervaart | 49-52 |
| Rémi Brague, Du temps chez Platon et Aristote. Quatre Etudes. Reviewed by |
|
| Yvon Lafrance | 52-54 |
| Contardo Calligaris, Hypothèses sur le fantasme Reviewed by |
|
| H. Warnes | 54-56 |
| John Deely, Introducing Semiotic, its History and Doctrine Reviewed by |
|
| François Latraverse | 56-58 |
| Jerry A. Fodor, The Modularity of Mind Reviewed by |
|
| William Seager | 58-60 |
| John Gray, Mill on Liberty: A Defence Reviewed by |
|
| C.L. Ten | 61-63 |
| Francis Jacques, Différence et subjectivité Reviewed by |
|
| Bernard Carnois | 63-67 |
| Philip J. Kain, Schiller, Hegel, and Marx: State, Society, and the Ideal of Ancient Greece Reviewed by |
|
| Gary Shapiro | 68-71 |
| Anthony Kenny, The Computation of Style: An Introduction to Statistics for Students of Literature and Humanities Reviewed by |
|
| Beret Lang | 71-73 |
| Yvon Lafrance, Méthode et exégèse en histoire de la philosophie Reviewed by |
|
| Georges Leroux | 74-76 |
| Nicholas Lash, A Matter of Hope: A Theologian's Reflections on the Thought of Karl Marx Reviewed by |
|
| Charles Davis | 76-79 |
| Jay Newman, Foundations of Religious Tolerance Reviewed by |
|
| Hugo Meynell | 79-80 |
| Samuel Scheffler, The Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions Reviewed by |
|
| Richmond Campbell | 81-83 |
| Amartya Sen & Bernard Williams, eds., Utilitarianism and Beyond Reviewed by |
|
| C. Dyke | 84-86 |
| R.S. Summers, Instrumentalism and Legal Theory Reviewed by |
|
| Aleksander Peczenik | 87-89 |
| Emmanuel Todd, La troisième planète. Structures familiales et systemes idéologiques Reviewed by |
|
| Yvan Simonis | 90-92 |
This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommerical 3.0 Unported license.
Philosophy in Review
University of Victoria