Two Blind Mice: Sight, Insight, and Narrative Authority in Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
Abstract
In this essay, I explore Doyle's narrative techniques, arguing that he focalizes the plot through three distinct narrative perspectives--Watson, Holmes' client, and Holmes himself--to embody three different modes of seeing. I argue that Holmes gains narrative authority through his omniscience, and, as he is the only character who is truly able to 'see,' he is the only one with the power to enact and propel the narrative.References
Doyle, Arthur Conan. The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. 1993. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.
Felman, Shoshana. “Education and Crisis, or the Vicissitudes of Teaching.” Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. Ed Shoshana Felman and Dori Laub. New York: Routledge, 1992. 1-56. Print.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Trans. Robert Hurley. 1972. New York: Vintage—Random House, 1990. Print.
Krasner, James. “Watson Falls Asleep: Narrative Frustration and Sherlock Holmes.” English Literature in Transition, 1880-1920 40.4 (1997): 424-436. Web. November 27 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Any submissions made by the author to the Albatross are in agreement of release under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported license. This license permits The Albatross as well as others to share this work through any means for non-commercial purposes given that proper attribution is given to the author as well as the publisher.
Authors retain copyright of their work.
By submitting their article to The Albatross, the author grants the The Albatross the rights for first publishing.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.