Indigenous Sacred Sites & Lands
Pursuing Preservation Through Colonial Constitutional Frameworks
Sacred sites and lands are vital to the spiritualities of many Indigenous peoples in Canada. However, colonial conceptions of land ownership, land use, and religion have worked in concert to stifle the preservation of Indigenous sacred sites and lands. This article examines three options, based in the Constitution Act, 1982, that Indigenous peoples in Canada may pursue to preserve their sacred sites and lands: the section 35 title option, the section 35 rights option, and the section 2(a) Charter option. This paper suggests that the legal frameworks associated with each option perpetuate colonial values, whether it is the dispossession of land, the belief that land is only a commodity, or the superiority of Christianity over Indigenous spiritualities. By constructing legal frameworks that make the preservation of sacred sites and lands so difficult, Indigenous spiritualities are only further oppressed by the Canadian state.
The opinions expressed in APPEAL are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Editors or the Faculty of Law. APPEAL is a refereed review. While every effort is made by the Publisher and the Editorial Board to ensure that APPEAL contains no inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or statement, the information and opinions contained within are the sole responsibility of the authors. Accordingly, the Publisher, the Editorial Board, the Editors and their respective employees and volunteers accept no responsibility or liability for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading information, opinion or statement.
Copyright © (2018) Appeal Publishing Society.
All rights reserved. Requests for permission to reproduce or republish any material from anyedition of Appeal should be sent to Appeal Publishing Society.