COMBATTING HETEROPATRIARCHAL AND HETERONORMATIVE INFLUENCES IN INDIGENOUS GOVERNANCE
Abstract
In 2004 and 2005, elected officials of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma and the Navajo Nation Council passed laws to prohibit same-sex marriage. These laws reflect concerns from Indigenous feminist and queer scholars that heteropatriarchal and heteronormative ideas have distorted some Indigenous communities’ understandings of sovereignty, tradition, and self-governance. This article draws on Indigenous feminist legal theory (“IFLT”) and queer Indigenous studies (“QIS”) to argue that Indigenous communities must challenge and resist internalized heteropatriarchal and heteronormative ideologies to avoid perpetuating the settler-colonial agenda. By applying the principles of IFLT and QIS, Indigenous communities can develop responsive, collaborative, and culturally informed self-governance practices to ensure the equitable treatment of gender-marginalized and queer Indigenous peoples within their community.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The opinions expressed in APPEAL are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Editors or the Faculty of Law. APPEAL is a refereed review. While every effort is made by the Publisher and the Editorial Board to ensure that APPEAL contains no inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or statement, the information and opinions contained within are the sole responsibility of the authors. Accordingly, the Publisher, the Editorial Board, the Editors and their respective employees and volunteers accept no responsibility or liability for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading information, opinion or statement.
Copyright © (2018) Appeal Publishing Society.
All rights reserved. Requests for permission to reproduce or republish any material from anyedition of Appeal should be sent to Appeal Publishing Society.