Stücke: Graphic Vignettes and the Haptic Response in László Nemes’s Saul fia
Abstract
This article examines László Nemes’s film Saul fia (2015) and its visual and sonic use of brutalized human bodies to induce a haptic response in its audience. Presented out of focus and often at the periphery of the shot, the visual frame of human death causes viewers of the film to recoil into the centre of the frame—a space typically occupied by the film’s protagonist, Saul Auslӓnder. This article argues that these visually and sonically induced haptic triggers, and the claustrophobia that results, tether the audience to Auslӓnder to re-centre the viewer’s gaze as that of a companion rather than perpetrator. Drawing from extant literature on cinematic haptics and filmic representations of the Holocaust, this article engages with contemporary discourses on graphic Holocaust representations in contemporary feature-length films to examine the impact of graphic imagery and haptic cinematics on the perspective and ability of the viewer to subvert the perpetrator gaze.
Downloads
References
Anderton, A. (2019). The sound of atrocity propaganda: Listening to the concentration camp in allied cultural memory. German Studies Review, 42(3), 449–518. https://doi:10.1353/gsr.2019.0078
Arendt, H. (1962). The origins of totalitarianism. The World Publishing Company. (Original work published 1951).
Assmann, Jan. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity (J. Czaplicka, Trans.). New German Critique, 65, 125–133. (Original work published 1988). https://www.jstor.org/stable/488538
Assmann, Jan. (2002). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrifft, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen [Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination]. C. H. Beck. (Original work published 1992).
Auerhahn, N. (2021). In the shadow of the crematorium: Son of Saul, The grey zone, and a second-generation childhood. American Imago, 78(3), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2021.0020
Barthes, R. (2000). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography (R. Howard, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1980).
Barthes, R. (1997). The Eiffel Tower and other mythologies (R. Howard, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1979).
Barthes, R. (1991). The responsibility of forms: Critical essays on music, art, and representation (R. Howard, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1985).
Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction (H. Zohn, Trans.) In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and reflections, (pp. 217–226). Schocken Books. (Original work published 1935).
Chomsky, M. J. (Director). (1978). Holocaust [TV series]. Titus Productions.
Coulthard, L. (2012). Haptic aurality: Listening to the films of Michael Haneke. Film-Philosophy, 16(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2012.0002
Erll, A. (2011). The invention of cultural memory: A short history of memory studies (S. B. Young, Trans.). In Memory in culture (pp. 13–37). Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321670
Feigelson, K., & Portuges, C. (2017). Screen memory: The Jewish question. Hungarian Studies, 31(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1556/044.2017.31.1.2
Fisher, J. (2014). The haptic horrors of war: Towards a phenomenology of affect and emotion in the war genre in Germany, 1910s to 1950s. Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies, 50(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.3138/SEM.50.1.51
Hanich, J. (2010). Cinematic emotion in horror films and thrillers: The aesthetic paradox of pleasurable fear. Routledge.
Haragos, S. (2021). Daughter of Saul or Saul leanya: The gendered place of Atrocity in László Nemes’s Son of Saul. Camera Obscura, 36(2), 98–125. https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-9052816
Hirsch, M. (2001). Surviving images: Holocaust photographs and the work of postmemory. The Yale Journal of Criticism, 14(1), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1353/yale.2001.0008
Keilbach, J. (2009). Photographs, symbolic images and the Holocaust: On the (im)possibility of depicting historical truth. History and Theory, 48(2), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2009.00498.x
Knittel, S. C. (2010). Bridging the silence: Towards a literary memory of Nazi euthanasia. In E. Joshua & M. Schillmeier (Eds.), Disability in German literature, film, and theater (pp. 83–103). Camden House.
Langford, B. (1999). “You cannot look at this”: Thresholds of unrepresentability in Holocaust film. The Journal of Holocaust Education, 8(3), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.1999.11087094
Lanzmann, C. (Director). (1985). Shoah [Film]. Historia Films; Films Aleph.
Margitházi, B. (2020). Embodying sense memory: Archive image and traumatic experience in
Son of Saul, Warsaw uprising and Regina. Studies in Eastern European Cinema, 11(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/2040350X.2018.1536019
Naveh, G. S. (2005). Glimmerings of the gallows: Representing the Holocaust in film and fiction. Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 28(1), 29–42. https://heinonline-org.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tjeflr28&i=45
Nemes, L. (Director). (2015). Saul fia [Son of Saul] [Film]. Laokoon Filmgroup.
Plantinga, C. (2009). Moving viewers: American film and the spectator’s experience. University of California Press.
Polanski, R. (Director). (2002). The pianist [Film]. R.P. Productions.
Ratner, M. (2016). Imagining the unimaginable: Interview with László Nemes on Son of Saul. Film Quarterly, 69(3), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2016.69.3.58
Reynolds, D. (2016). Consumers or witnesses? Holocaust tourists and the problem of authenticity. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(2), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540516635396
Shklovsky, Viktor. (2015). Art, as device (A. Berlina, Trans.). Poetics Today, 36(3), 151–174.
(Original work published 1919). https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-3160709
Sontag, S. (2013). On photography. In D. Rieff (Ed.), Susan Sontag: Essays of the 1960s & 70s (pp. 523–674). Literary classics of the United States. (Original work published 1977).
Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the pain of others. Picador.
Spielberg, S. (Director). (1993). Schindler’s list [Film]. Amblin Entertainment; Universal Pictures.
Stier, O. B. (2020). The place of Holocaust survivor videotestimony: Navigating the landmarks of first-person audio-visual representation. In V. Aarons & P. Lassner (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of Holocaust literature and culture (pp. 669–686). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33428-4_36
Vincze, T. (2016). The phenomenology of trauma: Sound and haptic sensuality in Son of Saul. Acta Univ. Sapientiae; Film and Media Studies, 13(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/ausfm-2016-0017
Wallen, J. (2021). Facing the Sonderkommando: Son of Saul and the dynamics of witnessing. Holocaust Studies, 27(2), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2019.1637502
Wiedenmann, Nicole. (2004). So ist das, was das Bild dokumentiert, das Gegenteil dessen, was es symbolisiert: Holocaustfotografie im Spannungsfeld zwischen Geschichtswissenschaft und kulturellem Gedächtnis [So it is that the picture documents the opposite of what it symbolizes: Holocaust photography in the crossroads between history and cultural memory]. In F. Crivellari, K. Kirchmann, M. Sandl & R. Schlögl (Eds.), Die Medien der Geschichte. Historizität und Medialität in interdisziplinärer Perspektive (pp. 317–349). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbh.
Wollaston, I. (2021). (Re-)visualizing the ‘Heart of Hell’? Representation of the Auschwitz Sonderkommando in the art of David Olère and Son of Saul (László Nemes, 2015). Holocaust Studies, 27(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2019.1625119
Zelizer, Barbie. (1998). Remembering to forget: Holocaust memory through the camera’s eye. University of Chicago Press.
Copyright (c) 2022 Sarah Wald

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the Artbutus Review agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.