• E. Dianne Looker Acadia University and Mount Saint Vincent University


This paper examines the options facing rural versus urban youth as they negotiate the complex mobilities of moving into adulthood. Specifically, it looks at the links between geographic mobility into and out of one’s home community, and mobility into and out of the parental home. Qualitative and numeric data from a longitudinal survey of 1200 youth provide insight into these transitions. Leaving the parental home is clearly a process rather than an event, and for many it is subjective and ambiguous. More rural youth than urban expected to leave both their parental home and their community, for education and work, and more in fact did leave, by age 19 and 22. This pattern reflects the often limited educational and work options in rural areas. Many youth returned to the parental home for varying lengths of time; again, more rural than urban youth followed this pattern. Urban youth more often have the option of staying close to home to pursue further education or find a job. The parental home serves as an important safety net for youth, especially those who may have been pushed to leave because of limited options nearby. Having the option of returning home gives youth an additional way of dealing with the challenges of their complex mobilities. The results confirm that the pressures on rural youth as they grapple with the mobilities options available to them are quite different than those on their urban counterparts. Thus, rural youth are more often faced with the complexities inherent in the links between social and spatial mobilities.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

E. Dianne Looker, Acadia University and Mount Saint Vincent University

Professor Emerita


Andres, L., Anisef, P., Krahn, E. D. Looker, & V. Thiessen. (1998). Longitudinal research on youth transitions in English Canada, from the1970s to the 1990s. In M. Gauthier & D. Pacom (Eds.), Spotlight on … Canadian youth research (pp. 21-40). Laval University Press.

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.

Bynner, J. (2005). Rethinking the youth phase of the life-course: The case for emerging adulthood? Journal of Youth Studies, 8(4), 367–384.

Corbett, M. (2007). Learning to leave: The irony of schooling in a coastal community. Fernwood Press.

Du Bois-Reymond, M. (1998). “I don’t want to commit myself yet”: Young people’s life concepts. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 63–79.

Findlay, A., McCollum, D., Coulter, R., & Gayle, V. (2015). New mobilities across the life course: A framework for analysing demographically linked drivers of migration. Population, Space and Place, 21(4), 390–402.

Frenette, M., (2003). Access to college and university: Does distance matter (Catalogue no.11F0019MIE — No. 201). Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.

Frenette, M. (2007). Do universities benefit local youth? Evidence from university and college participation, and graduate earnings following the creation of a new university (Catalogue no. 11F0019MIE — No. 283). Statistics Canada.

Holdsworth, C. (2009). ‘Going away to uni’: Mobility, modernity, and independence of English higher education students. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(8), 1849–1864.

Leccardi, C. (2006). Facing uncertainty, temporarilities and biographies in the new century. In C. Leccardi & E. Ruspini (Eds.), A new youth?: Young people, generations and family life (pp. 15–40). Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

Looker, E. D. (2000, June). Leaving the parental home: Implications for rural and urban youth [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Looker, E. D. (2002). Why don’t they go on? Factors affecting the decisions of Canadian youth not to pursue post-secondary education. Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation.

Malatest, R. A., & Associates. (2002). Research into rural youth migration. Rural Secretariat.

Mortelmans, D., Meier, P., & Defever, C. (2016). Intersectionality in young adults’ households: A quantitative perspective. In D. Mortelmans, K. Matthijs, E. Alofs, & B. Segaert (Eds.), Changing family dynamics and demographic evolution: The family kaleidoscope (Ch. 4). Edward Elgar.

Rinallo, J. (2016, July 10–14). Is time to leave the nest? Describing and explaining time in the transition from youth to adulthood [Paper presentation]. 3rd ISA Forum of Sociology, Vienna, Austria.

Rossignon, F., Studer, M., Gauthier, J.-A., & Le Goff, J.-M. (2016). Childhood family structure and home-leaving: A combination of survival and sequence analyses. In G. Ritschard & M. Studer (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on sequence analysis and related methods: LaCOSA II (pp. 383–427).

Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207–226.

Sage, J., Evandrou, M., & Falkingham, J. (2013). Onwards or homewards? Complex graduate migration pathways, well‐being, and the ‘parental safety net’. Population, Space and Place, 19(6), 738–755.

Swartz, T. T., Kim, M., Uno, M., Mortimer, J., & O’Brien, K. B. (2011). Safety nets and scaffolds: Parental support in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(2), 414–429.

Tosi, M. (2016). Leaving home sooner or later: Co-residence and parent–adult child relations in Italy and Sweden [Doctoral dissertation, University of Trento].

How to Cite
Looker, E. D. (2021). THE COMPLEX MOBILITIES OF RURAL VERSUS URBAN YOUTH: MOBILITY INTO AND OUT OF THE PARENTAL HOME AND ONE’S COMMUNITY. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 12(2), 48-64.