EVERYDAY RESISTANCE IN MAKING ONESELF VISIBLE: YOUNG ADULTS’ NEGOTIATIONS WITH INSTITUTIONAL SOCIAL CONTROL IN YOUTH SERVICES
Abstract
This article concerns young adults’ institutional encounters with professionals in the context of youth services. The encounters are analyzed as institutional social control — the practices and mechanisms that steer young people’s conduct in accordance with the normative order. We make visible young adults’ acts of everyday resistance as they negotiate, problematize, and challenge aspects of institutional social control. The data consist of 17 life-course interviews with young adults aged 18 to 24 who visited youth shelters organized by the Finnish Red Cross. Participants expressed criticism of the normative expectations and the categorizing and controlling practices that they encountered. However, there is a danger that in the institutional encounters, their acts of everyday resistance are not acknowledged as political agency; instead, stereotypical notions strengthen the interpretation of the young adults as problematic or in need of protection. This lack of recognition may contribute to increased vulnerability in the young people the institutions are intended to support.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aaltonen, S., Berg, P., & Ikäheimo, S. (2015). Nuoret luukulla. Kolme näkökulmaa syrjäytymiseen ja nuorten asemaan palvelujärjestelmässä [Youth at the agency hatch. Three perspectives on exclusion and the position of young people in the service system]. Nuorisotutkimusverkosto/Nuorisotutkimusseura, julkaisuja, 160. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-442-7
Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In A. Sen & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 88–94). World Institute for Development Economics Research. Clarendon Press.
Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L., & Stefánsson, K. (2012). The future of the welfare state: Rethinking universalism. In A. Anttonen, L. Häikiö, & K. Stefansson (Eds.), Welfare state, universalism and diversity (pp. 187–196). Edward Elgar.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. AltaMira Press.
Blackman, S., & Rogers, R. (Eds.). (2017). Youth marginality in Britain: Contemporary studies of austerity. Policy Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brunila, K., & Lundahl, L. (2020). Introduction. In K. Brunila & L. Lundahl (Eds.), Youth on the move: Tendencies and tensions in youth policies and practices (pp. 1–14). Helsinki University Press.
Campbell, M., & Gregor, F. (2015). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. University of Toronto Press.
Clarke, R. (2010). Intentional omissions. Noûs, 44(1), 158–177. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00735.x
Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Polity Press.
Davies, B. (2019). Austerity, youth policy and the deconstruction of the youth service in England. Palgrave Macmillan.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2013). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity.
Eurostat. (2019). Estimated average age of young people leaving the parental household by sex. Retrieved on December 17, 2020, from https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=yth_demo_030&lang=en
Finnish Red Cross. (2021). Tilastokirja vuodelta 2020 [Statistical yearbook 2020]. Retrieved on March 7, 2022 from https://rednet.punainenristi.fi/system/files/page/Tilastokirja2020.pdf
Gilliom, J., & Monahan, T. (2012). Everyday resistance. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 405–411). Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Doubleday Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. Penguin Books.
Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need: Climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Edward Elgar.
Harris, A., Wyn, J., & Younes, S. (2007). Young people and citizenship. An everyday perspective. Youth Studies Australia, 26(3), 19–27.
Head, E. (2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 335–344. doi:10.1080/13645570802246724
Hiitola, J., Turtiainen, K., & Vuori, J. (2020). Small agency and precarious residency in Afghan refugee families. In J. Hiitola, K. Turtiainen, S. Gruber, & J. Vuori (Eds.), Family life in transition: Borders, transnational mobility and welfare society in Nordic countries (pp. 177–188). Routledge.
Hollander, J. A., & Einwohner, R. L. (2004). Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum, 19(4), 533–554. doi:10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5
Honkasalo, M.-L. (2013). Katveessa: Pieni toimijuus kriittisenä avauksena toiminnan teoriaan [In the dead zone: The small action as a critical opening to the theory of action]. Tiede Ja Edistys, 1, 42–61.
Honkatukia, P., & Keskinen, S. (2018). The social control of young women’s clothing and bodies: A perspective of differences on racialization and sexualization. Ethnicities, 18(1), 142–161. doi:10.1177/1468796817701773
Honkatukia, P., Nyqvist, L., & Pösö, T. (2007). Violence talk and gender in youth residential care. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 8(1), 56–76. doi:10.1080/14043850701276402
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
Hughes, G., Cooper, C., Gormally, S., & Rippingale, J. (2014). The state of youth work in austerity England: Reclaiming the ability to ‘care’. Youth & Policy, 113, 1–14.
Ikonen, R., Hietamäki, J., Laakso, R., Heino, T., Seppänen, J., & Halme, N. (2017). Sijoitettujen lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointi. Kouluterveyskyselyn tuloksia [Welfare of children and adolescents in custody. School Health Survey]; Tutkimuksesta tiiviisti 21. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos.
Isin, E. F. (2008). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen, (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 15–43). Zed Books.
Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2016). Dimensions of everyday resistance: An analytical framework. Critical Sociology, 42(3), 417–435. doi:10.1177/0896920514524604
Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2020). Conceptualizing “everyday resistance”: A transdisciplinary approach. Routledge.
Johansson, T., & Lalander, P. (2012). Doing resistance: Youth and changing theories of resistance. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(8), 1078–1088. doi:10.1080/13676261.2012.693591
Kallio, K. P., Wood, B. E., & Häkli, J. (2020). Lived citizenship: Conceptualising an emerging field. Citizenship Studies, March, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13621025.2020.1739227
Leskošek, V., & Zidar, R. (2017). Food poverty between charity and the human right to food. In A.-L. Matthies & K. Närhi (Eds.), The ecosocial transition of societies: The contribution of social work and social policy (pp. 251–268). Routledge.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
Lister, R. (2008). Unpacking children’s citizenship. In A. Invernizzi & J. Williams (Eds.), Children and citizenship (pp. 23–32). SAGE.
Lister, R., Smith, N., Middleton, S., & Cox, L. (2003). Young people talk about citizenship: Empirical perspectives on theoretical and political debates. Citizenship Studies, 7(2), 235–253. doi:10.1080/1362102032000065991
Louhela, H. (2019). Sexual violence: Voiced and silenced by girls with multiple vulnerabilities. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu]. http://jultika.oulu.fi/files/isbn9789526224152.pdf
McAllister, M. (2003). Multiple meanings of self harm: A critical review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 12(3), 177–185. doi:10.1046/j.1440-0979.2003.00287.x
Myllyniemi, S., & Suurpää, L. (2009). Nuoret aikuiset itsellisyyden ja riippuvuuden noidankehässä [Young adults in the vicious circle of independence and dependency]. Hyvinvointikatsaus, 1, 2–4.
Mäkinen, S., & Halonen, T. (2017). Januskasvoinen portinvartija: Ohjaus tukena ja kontrollina julkisissa palveluissa [Two-faced gatekeeper: Guidance as support and control in public services]. In S. Aaltonen & A. Kivijärvi, (Eds.), Nuoret aikuiset hyvinvointipalvelujen käyttäjinä ja kohteina. [Young adults as users and objects of welfare services.] Nuorisotutkimusverkosto/Nuorisotutkimusseura, Julkaisuja, 198, 151–172.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
Scott, J. C. (2020). Foreword. In A. Johansson & S. Vinthagen, Conceptualizing “everyday resistance”: A transdisciplinary approach (pp. ix–xi). Routledge.
Scott, S. (2018). A sociology of nothing: Understanding the unmarked. Sociology, 52(1) 3–19. doi:10.1177/0038038517690681
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as a problematic: A feminist sociology. University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. AltaMira.
Suikkanen, A., & Viinamäki, L. (1999). Life paths and labour market citizenship. In J. Christiansen, P. Koistinen, & A. Kovalainen (Eds.), Working Europe. Reshaping European employment systems (pp. 189–209). Ashgate.
Thomson, R., Bell, R., Holland, J., Henderson, S., McGrellis, S., & Sharpe, S. (2002). Critical moments: Choice, chance and opportunity in young people’s narratives of transition. Sociology, 36(2), 335–354. doi:10.1177/0038038502036002006
Thurlby-Campbell, I., & Bell, L. (2017). Agency, structure and the NEET policy problem: The experiences of young people. Bloomsbury Academic.
Weitz, R. (2001). Women and their hair: Seeking power through resistance and accommodation. Gender and Society, 15(5), 667–686. doi:10.1177/089124301015005003
Whittaker, L. (2010). Structures of recognition: A dialogical analysis of the experiences of a group of young people within a Scottish local authority access programme. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 4(2), 75–93.
Wood, B. E. (2016). A genealogy of the “everyday” within young people's citizenship studies. In K. P. Kallio, S. Mills, & T. Skelton, (Eds.), Politics, citizenship and rights (pp. 383–399). Springer.
Wyn, J. (2020). Introduction. In J. Wyn, H. Cahill, D. Woodman, H. Cuervo, C. Leccardi. & J. Chesters (Eds.), Youth and the new adulthood: Generations of change (pp. 1–12). Springer.
Authors contributing to the International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Rights Granted After Publication
After publication, authors may reuse portions or the full article without obtaining formal permission for inclusion within their thesis or dissertation.
Permission for these reuses is granted on the following conditions:
- that full acknowledgement is made of the original publication stating the specific material reused [pages, figure numbers, etc.], [Title] by/edited by [Author/editor], [year of publication], reproduced by permission of International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies [link to IJCYFS website];
- In the case of joint-authored works, it is the responsibility of the author to obtain permission from co-authors for the work to be reuse/republished;
- that reuse on personal websites and institutional or subject-based repositories includes a link to the work as published in the International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies; and that the material is not distributed under any kind of Open Access style licences (e.g. Creative Commons) which may affect the Licence between the author and IJCYFS.
