CENTERING GRASSROOTS ACTORS IN NETWORKING FOR CHILD PROTECTION IN EAST AFRICA
Abstract
Violence against children (VAC) is both a global and local concern that has resulted in several child protection initiatives by formal and informal networks in East Africa. The dominant narrative on networking for VAC prevention and response significantly focuses on the functionality of formal networks and ignores grassroots networks. We conducted research to explore the functionality and corresponding impact of diverse networks that work to prevent and respond to VAC in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Study participants were VAC network leads at grassroots, subnational, and national levels, and network funders. Data were collected using interviews, document review, and focus group discussions. We found that scholarly literature illuminates the role of formal networks at the expense of grassroots networks, which are ignored and minoritized in literature. This may contribute to a disparity between the funding of grassroots and formal networks. Yet, grassroots network actors are VAC first responders and are instrumental in child protection work. We contend that it is vital to center grassroots networks in VAC policies, programs, and research in order to achieve sustainable connections between networks, communities, and funders, and to empower communities to protect children from abuse.
Downloads
Metrics
References
African Committee on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACERWC). (2017). Africa’s agenda for children 2040: Fostering an Africa fit for children. https://au.int/sites/default/files/newsevents/agendas/africas_agenda_for_children-english.pdf
Asingwire, N., Muhangi, D., Namara, R. B., & Kemigisa, M. (2015). Governance, performance and sustainability of non-state social protection services in Uganda [Research working paper no. 010]. Partnership for African Social and Governance to (PASGR). https://www.pasgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Governance-performance-and-
sustainability-of-non-state-social-protection-services-in-Uganda-Asingwire-et-al.pdf
Awortwi, N. (2018). Social protection is a grassroots reality: Making the case for policy reflections on community‐based social protection actors and services in Africa. Development Policy Review, 36, O897–O913. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12364
Awortwi, N., & Aiyede, R. E. (2017). Politics, public policy and social protection in Africa: Evidence from cash transfer programmes. Routledge.
Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
Brinkerhoff, D. W. (1999). State-civil society networks for policy implementation in developing countries. Review of Policy Research, 16(1), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00844.x
Brown, R. B. (2006). Doing your dissertation in business and management: The reality of research and writing. Sage.
Castro Félix, A., & DuPree, A. S. (2014). What we have learned about grassroots philanthropy: Lessons from Mexico. The Foundation Review, 6(4), 44–64. . https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1225
Christens, B. D. (2012). Targeting empowerment in community development: A community psychology approach to enhancing local power and well-being. Community Development Journal, 47(4), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bss031
Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 435–436. PMID: 30304614
Cummings, S., & van Zee, A. (2005). Communities of practice and networks: Reviewing two perspectives on social learning. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 1(1), 8–22.
Curtin, M., & Fossey, E. (2007). Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x
de Bruin Cardoso, I., with S. Long. (2019). Strengthening referral pathways for children and adolescents affected by sexual violence. Catholic Relief Services. https://www.crs.org/sites/default/files/tools-research/4c_strengthening_referral_pathways.pdf
Egger, U. K. (2004). International networks for knowledge sharing: Lessons learnt? Skat Foundation, Resource Centre for Development. https://skat-foundation.ch/book/international-networks-for-knowledge-sharing/
Engel, P. G. H. (1993). Daring to share: Networking among non-government organizations. In C. Alders, B. Haverkort, & L. Veldhuizen (Eds), Linking with farmers: networking for low-external-input and sustainable agriculture (pp. 131–150). Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780445328.010
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative results. Aldine.
Goodman, L. A., Banyard, V., Woulfe, J., Ash, S., & Mattern, G. (2016). Bringing a network-oriented approach to domestic violence services: A focus group exploration of promising practices. Violence Against Women, 22(1), 54–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215599080
Hayes, B. E., & Franklin, C. A. (2017). Community effects on women’s help seeking behaviour for intimate partner violence in India: Gender disparity, feminist theory, and empowerment. International Journal of Comparative and Applies Criminal Justice, 41(1–2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2016.1233443
Johnson, A. K., & Sloth-Nielsen, J. (2020). Safeguarding children in the developing-world: Beyond intra-organisational policy and self-regulation. Social Sciences, 9(6), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9060098
Kyriakakis, S. (2014). Mexican immigrant women reaching out: The role of informal networks in the process of seeking help for intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 20(9), 1097–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214549640
Loizou, E., & Charalambous, N. (2017). Empowerment pedagogy. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2017.1314396
Mbiti, J. S. (1972). African religions and philosophies. Philosophy East and West, 22(3), 339–340.
McLeigh, J. D., Katz, C., Davidson-Arad, B., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2017). The cultural adaptation of a community-based child maltreatment prevention initiative. Family Process, 56(2), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12193
Mizrahi, T., & Rosenthal, B. B. (2001). Complexities of coalition building: Leaders’ successes, strategies, struggles, and solutions. Social Work, 46(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/46.1.63
Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), e67670. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
Organization of African Unity. (1990). African charter on the rights and welfare of the child [CAB/LEG/24.9/49 (1990)]. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38c18.html
Padron, M. (1991). Networking and learning. Reflexion, 1(1).
Page, N., & Czuba, C. E. (1999). Empowerment: What is it? Journal of Extension, 37(5), 1–5. https://archives.joe.org/joe/1999october/comm1.php
Plucknett D. L., Smith N. J. H., & Ozgediz S. (1990). Networking in international agricultural research. Cornell University Press.
Rowan, K., Mumford, E., & Clark, C. J. (2015). Is women’s empowerment associated with help-seeking for spousal violence in India? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(9), 1519–1548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515618945
Savage, G. T., Bunn, M. D., Gray, B., Xiao, Q., Wang, S., Wilson, E. J., & Williams, E. S. (2010). Stakeholder collaboration: Implications for stakeholder theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0939-1
September, R. L. (2006). The progress of child protection in South Africa. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(1), S65–S72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00446.x
Spilsbury, J. C., & Korbin, J. E. (2013). Social networks and informal social support in protecting children from abuse and neglect: Community ties and supports promote children’s safety. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(Supp.), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.027
Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/126
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2006). Convention on the rights of the child: General comment no. 8. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/pdf/gc8.pdf/
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2011). Convention on the rights of the child: General comment no. 13. https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/crc.c.gc.13_en.pdf
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
Walakira, E. J., Kikulwe, D., Luwangula, R., Riley, M., Bukenya, B., & Ddumba-Nyanzi, I. (2017). System strengthening to improve alternative care for neglected and child survivors of violence in Uganda: Critical areas for consideration. In D. Kaawa-Mafigiri & E. Walakira (Eds.), Child abuse and neglect in Uganda (pp. 253–270). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48535-5_13
Wenger, E. (1997). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wessells, M. G. (2015). Bottom-up approaches to strengthening child protection systems: Placing children, families, and communities at the center. Child Abuse & Neglect, 43, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.006
World Health Organization. (2020). Global status report on preventing violence against children 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240004191 [accessed 15 January 2021]
Younis, M. (2017). Evaluating coalitions and networks: Frameworks, needs, and opportunities. Center for Evaluation Innovation. https://efc.issuelab.org/resources/29445/29445.pdf
Zijderveld, A. C. (2000). The institutional imperative: The interface of institutions and networks. Leiden University Press.
Authors contributing to the International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Rights Granted After Publication
After publication, authors may reuse portions or the full article without obtaining formal permission for inclusion within their thesis or dissertation.
Permission for these reuses is granted on the following conditions:
- that full acknowledgement is made of the original publication stating the specific material reused [pages, figure numbers, etc.], [Title] by/edited by [Author/editor], [year of publication], reproduced by permission of International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies [link to IJCYFS website];
- In the case of joint-authored works, it is the responsibility of the author to obtain permission from co-authors for the work to be reuse/republished;
- that reuse on personal websites and institutional or subject-based repositories includes a link to the work as published in the International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies; and that the material is not distributed under any kind of Open Access style licences (e.g. Creative Commons) which may affect the Licence between the author and IJCYFS.
