NEUROSCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND CARE LEAVING: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY CRITICAL COMMENTARY
Abstract
While neuroscientific literature suggests that some parts of the brain are not fully developed until the mid-20s, public discourse is skewed toward early child development (ECD) because of its supposed long-term economic benefits. Some researchers have gone so far as to say that society overinvests in remedial programs for disadvantaged adolescents. Such claims resist advocacy efforts for extended care for children in out-of-home care and discourage policy and legislative concerns regarding investing in early adulthood. In this commentary, we unpack the literature on brain development and critically discuss its selective use by legislators and policymakers for investments in ECD. Despite the availability of neuroscientific and economic evidence, it is not prominent in the discourse surrounding supportive interventions like extending care. Using Bourdieu’s theory of social reproduction, we discuss how preference is given to only the type of knowledge that preserves the social structures that work to ensure the multigenerational flow of capital among dominant groups. Also, social institutions act within the dimensions set by the social structure, constantly shaping and reshaping ways of facilitating capital preservation among the upper classes. We conclude that, in addition to moral argument, the current neuroscientific evidence may support investment in extended care programs.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Antle, B. F., Johnson, L., Barbee, A., & Sullivan, D. (2009). Fostering interdependent versus independent living in youth aging out of care through healthy relationships. Families in Society, 90(3), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3890
Arain, M., Haque, M., Johal, L., Mathur, P., Nel, W., Rais, A., Sandhu, R., & Sharma, S. (2013). Maturation of the adolescent brain. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 9, 449–461. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S39776
Armstrong-Heimsoth, A., Hahn-Floyd, M., Williamson, H. J., Kurka, J. M., Yoo, W., & Rodríguez De Jesús, S. A. (2021). Former foster system youth: Perspectives on transitional supports and programs. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 48, 287–305. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-020-09693-6
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0003-066X.55.5.469
Barker, B., Shoveller, J., Grant, C., Kerr, T., & DeBeck, K. (2020). Long-term benefits of providing transitional services to youth aging-out of the child welfare system: Evidence from a cohort of young people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada. International Journal of Drug Policy, 85, Article 102912. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUGPO.2020.102912
Beddoe, L., & Joy, E. (2017). Questioning the uncritical acceptance of neuroscience in child and family policy and practice: A review of challenges to the current doxa. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss1id213
Blakemore, S.-J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202
Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education, and cultural change: Papers in the sociology of education (1st ed.). (pp. 487–511). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351018142
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Structures and the habitus. In V. Buchli (Ed.), Material culture: Critical concepts in the social sciences (Vol. 1, Part 1, pp.116-177). Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (2010). The forms of capital. (Originally published in 1986). In I. Szeman & T. Kaposy (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthology (pp. 81–93). Wiley-Blackwell.
Bruer, J. T. (1999). The myth of the first three years: A new understanding of early brain development and lifelong learning. Simon and Schuster.
Burns, K., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decision making and free will: A neuroscience perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.751
Casey, B.J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.010
Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2007). A science-based framework for early childhood policy: Using evidence to improve outcomes in learning, behavior, and health for vulnerable children. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/a-science-based-framework-for-early-childhood-policy/
Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2022a). In brief: The foundations of lifelong health. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/inbrief-the-foundations-of-lifelong-health/
Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2022b). Applying the science of child development in child welfare systems [Reports and working papers]. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/child-welfare-systems/
Chandler, J. A. (2015). The use of neuroscientific evidence in Canadian criminal proceedings. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3), 550–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv026
Featherstone, B., Morris, K., & White, S. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Policy Press.
Forbes, C., Inder, B., & Raman, S. (2016). Measuring the cost of leaving care in Victoria. Children Australia, 31(6), 26–33 [Special issue featuring keynote addresses and related papers from Towards Better Outcomes for Young People Leaving State Care: A conference held at Monash University on 22 November 2005]. (Original work published in 2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200011202
Foy, H. J., Runham, P., & Chapman, P. (2016). Prefrontal cortex activation and young driver behaviour: a f NIRS study. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0156512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156512
Gaetz, S., O’Grady, B., Kidd, S., & Schwan, K. (2016). Without a home: The National Youth Homelessness Survey. Canadian Observatory on Homelessness Press. https://www.homelesshub.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/WithoutAHome-final.pdf
Galvan, A., Hare, T., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B.J. (2007). Risk‐taking and the adolescent brain: Who is at risk? Developmental Science, 10(2), F8–F14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00579.x
Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., Paus, T., Evans, A. C., & Rapoport, J. L. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10), 861–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/13158
Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., Nugent, T. F., III, Herman, D. H., Clasen, L. S., Toga, A. W., Rapoport, J. L., & Thompson, P. M. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(21), 8174–8179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402680101
Greeson, J. K. P. (2013). Foster youth and the transition to adulthood: The theoretical and conceptual basis for natural mentoring. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812467780
Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128898
Heckman, J. J. (2016). There’s more to gain by taking a comprehensive approach to early childhood development. Heckman: The Economics of Human Potential. https://heckmanequation.org/www/assets/2017/01/F_Heckman_CBAOnePager_120516.pdf
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children [Working paper 13016]. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w13016/w13016.pdf
Hochberg, Z., & Konner, M. (2020). Emerging adulthood, a pre-adult life-history stage. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 10, 918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00918
Holmes, D., Murray, S. J., Perron, A., & Rail, G. (2006). Deconstructing the evidence‐based discourse in health sciences: Truth, power and fascism. International Journal of Evidence- Based Healthcare, 4(3), 180–186. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2006.00041.x
Irwin, L. G., Siddiqi, A., & Hertzman, C. (2007). Early child development: A powerful equalizer [Final report]. World Health Organization, Commission on Social Determinants of Health. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69729/a91213.pdf
Jones, A., Sinha, V., & Trocmé, N. (2015). Children and youth in out-of-home care in the Canadian provinces [CWRP Information Sheet #167E]. Centre for Research on Children and Families. http://cwrp.ca/sites/default/files/publications/en/167e.pdf
Kagan, J. (2000). Three seductive ideas. Harvard University Press.
Lee, C., & Berrick, J. D. (2014). Experiences of youth who transition to adulthood out of care: Developing a theoretical framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHILDYOUTH.2014.08.005
Mann-Feder, V. R. (2007). Issue editor’s notes. New directions for youth development, 2007(113), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.197
Mann-Feder, V. R., & Goyette, M. (Eds.). (2019). Leaving care and the transition to adulthood: International contributions to theory, research, and practice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190630485.001.0001
McGhee, K., & Deeley, S. (2022). Emerging adulthood: Exploring the implications for care experienced young people and those who care for them. Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care, 21(1).
Meixner, J. B., Jr. (2018). Neuroscience and mental competency: Current uses and future potential. Albany Law Review, 81(3), 995–1026.
Mendes, P., Purtell, J., & Waugh, J. (2022). Advancing the social rights of care leavers: Towards a new community-based social network and peer support model for supporting young people transitioning from out-of-home care in times of crisis. New Community, 20:2(78), 58–63. https://researchmgt.monash.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/398528642/leaving_care_social_rights_New_Community_published_version.pdf
Munro, E., & Musholt, K. (2014). Neuroscience and the risks of maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 47(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.002
Ontario Provincial Advocate for Children and Youth. (2012). 25 is the new 21: The cost and benefits of providing care & maintenance to Ontario youth until the age of 25. Ontario Provincial Advocate for Children and Youth. https://ocaarchives.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/25isthenew21.pdf
Packard, T., Delgado, M., Fellmeth, R., & McCready, K. (2008). A cost-benefit analysis of transitional services for emancipating foster youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(11), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.03.011
Perlman, S. B., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2011). Developing connections for affective regulation: Age-related changes in emotional brain connectivity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.006
Public Health Agency of Canada. (2019). Provincial and territorial child protection legislation and policy: 2018. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/publications/health-risks-safety/provincial-territorial-child-protection-legislation-policy-2018/64-03-18-2245_Child-Protection_EN-FINAL02.pdf
Rea, D., & Burton, T. (2020). New evidence on the Heckman curve. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12353
Rea, D., & Burton, T. (2021). Clarifying the nature of the Heckman curve. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4), 1257–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12359
Rocque, M. (2015). The lost concept: The (re) emerging link between maturation and desistance from crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15(3), 340–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814547710
Rome, S. H., & Raskin, M. (2019). Transitioning out of foster care: The first 12 months. Youth & Society, 51(4), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x17694968
Samango-Sprouse, C. (2007). Frontal lobe development in childhood. In B. L. Miller & J. L. Cummings (Eds.), The human frontal lobes: Functions and disorders (pp. 576–593). Guilford.
Schmitz, S., & Höppner, G. (2014). Neurofeminism and feminist neurosciences: A critical review of contemporary brain research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00546
Schwartz, Y., Williams, T. S., Roberts, S. D., Hellmann, J., & Zlotnik Shaul, R. (2018). Adolescent decision-making in Canadian medical contexts: Integrating neuroscience and consent frameworks. Paediatrics & Child Health, 23(6), 374–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxy037
Shaffer, M.,, Anderson, L., & Nelson, A. (2016). Opportunities in transition: An economic analysis of investing in youth aging out of foster care. Report 3 of 3: Opportunities for increased support. Vancouver Foundation: Fostering Change. https://assets.nationbuilder.com/vancouverfoundation/pages/227/attachments/original/1552419279/Fostering-Change-Opportunities-in-Transition-Report-3.pdf?1552419279
Shah, K. (2016). What’s in an age: Consider the neuroscience dimension of juvenile law. Southern California. Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 26, 167–188. https://mylaw2.usc.edu/why/students/orgs/ilj/assets/docs/26-1-Shah.pdf
Shewchuk, S. (2020). Transition supports to prevent homelessness for youth leaving out-of-home care. The Canadian Observatory on Homelessness. https://www.homelesshub.ca/resource/transition-supports-prevent-homelessness-youth-leaving-out-home-care
Smith L. (2014). John Bruer: Growing up in poverty doesn’t damage your brain irretrievably. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/06/john-bruer-growing-up-poverty-not-damage-brain-irretrievably
Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., & Toga, A. W. (2004). Mapping changes in the human cortex throughout the span of life. The Neuroscientist, 10(4), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858404263960
Steinberg, L. (2014). Should the science of adolescent brain development inform public policy? Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 50(2), 70–76. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview/492
Strahl, B., van Breda, A. D. P., Mann-Feder, V., & Schröer, W. (2020). A multinational comparison of care-leaving policy and legislation. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 37(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2020.26
Sukumaran, S. (2021). Improving outcomes for youth transitioning out of care: An analysis of Canada’s transition programs [Major Research Paper, University of Ottawa]. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/42640
Sundly, A., Gustafson D. L., & Ellenbogen, S. (2023). A scoping review of high-school outcomes of children in care in Anglosphere countries. Manuscript in preparation.
Tanner, J. L., & Arnett, J. J. (2016). The emergence of emerging adulthood: The new life stage between adolescence and young adulthood. In A. Furlong (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Youth and Young Adulthood (pp. 34–40). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753058-13
Toulany, A., Gorter, J. W., & Harrison, M. (2022). A call for action: Recommendations to improve transition to adult care for youth with complex health care needs. Paediatrics & Child Health, 27(5), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxac047
Trocmé, N., Esposito, T., Nutton, J., Rosser, V., & Fallon, B. (2019). Child welfare services in Canada. In L. Merkel-Holguin, J. D. Fluke, & R. D. Krugman (Eds.), National systems of child protection (pp. 27-50). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93348-1_3
Twardosz, S., & Lutzker, J. R. (2010). Child maltreatment and the developing brain: A review of neuroscience perspectives. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.003
Tweddle, A. (2007). Youth leaving care: How do they fare? New Directions for Youth Development, 113, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.199
Walsh, C. (2010). Youth justice and neuroscience: A dual-use dilemma. The British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq061
Wastell, D., & White, S. (2012). Blinded by neuroscience: Social policy, the family and the infant brain. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674312X656301
Yoder, K. J., & Decety, J. (2017). The neuroscience of morality and social decision-making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1414817
Authors contributing to the International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Rights Granted After Publication
After publication, authors may reuse portions or the full article without obtaining formal permission for inclusion within their thesis or dissertation.
Permission for these reuses is granted on the following conditions:
- that full acknowledgement is made of the original publication stating the specific material reused [pages, figure numbers, etc.], [Title] by/edited by [Author/editor], [year of publication], reproduced by permission of International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies [link to IJCYFS website];
- In the case of joint-authored works, it is the responsibility of the author to obtain permission from co-authors for the work to be reuse/republished;
- that reuse on personal websites and institutional or subject-based repositories includes a link to the work as published in the International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies; and that the material is not distributed under any kind of Open Access style licences (e.g. Creative Commons) which may affect the Licence between the author and IJCYFS.
