GENDERED AND INTERGENERATIONAL RELATIONALITIES IN FUTURE ORIENTATIONS: GUATEMALAN SCHOOLCHILDREN’S REPORTS OF GENDER ROLES IN PRESENT AND FUTURE HOUSEHOLDS
This article examines children and youth’s future orientation in rural Guatemala by examining their reports of activities of adults and children in present and future households. A total of 690 students in a small town in highland Guatemala completed a household task attribution form that listed 29 tasks in seven domains (domestic chores, care for children, household decisions, responsibilities, household purchases, work for money, development) with four gendered household figures (man, woman, boy, girl). Using cultural consensus analysis, we analyze patterns of agreement and variation in responses to determine the existence of shared cultural models and gendered submodels in both time periods. Taking a gendered and intergenerational relationality perspective, we focus on the ways that future orientations reflect, (re)produce, and contest contemporary gender norms. Reports of task distributions in the present reflect “traditional” gender norms divided along “productive” and “reproductive” lines. While male participants’ conceptions of the future largely reproduced these structures, female participants appeared willing to increase their own domestic work to foster greater gender equality among their children.
Anderson, M., Bechhofer, F., McCrone, D., Jamieson, L., Li, Y., & Stewart, R. (2005). Timespans and plans among young adults. Sociology, 39(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505049006
Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). Sage.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446218693
Bentley, A. (2021). The fiction of Javier Payeras and the neoliberal state: Framing queerness in postwar Guatemala. Journal of Gender and Sexuality Studies/Revista de Estudios de Género y Sexualidades, 47(2), 149–168. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/26/article/878764/pdf
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital. In I. Szeman & T. Kaposy (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthology (pp. 81–93). Wiley- Blackwell.
Brannen, J., & Nilsen, A. (2002). Young people’s time perspectives: From youth to adulthood. Sociology, 36(3), 513–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036003002
Brannen, J., & Nilsen, A. (2005). Individualisation, choice and structure: A discussion of current trends in sociological analysis. The Sociological Review, 53(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467954X.2005.00559.x
Brooks, R., & Everett, G. (2008). The prevalence of ‘life planning’: Evidence from UK graduates. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690801966410
Campaña, J. C., Giménez-Nadal, J. I., & Molina, J. A. (2018). Gender norms and the gendered distribution of total work in Latin American households. Feminist Economics, 24(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2017.1390320
Chant, S. (2002). Researching gender, families and households in Latin America: From the 20th into the 21st century. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21(4), 545–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/1470-9856.00059
Chisholm, L., & du Bois-Reymond, M. (1993). Youth transitions, gender and social change. Sociology, 27(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038593027002006
Colom, A. (2015). An analysis of the thousand days initiative. In A. Chary & P. Rohloff (Eds.), Privatization and the new medical pluralism: Shifting healthcare landscapes in Maya Guatemala (pp. 35–49). Lexington Books.
Covre-Sussai, M., Meuleman, B., Van Bavel, J., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Measuring gender equality in family decision making in Latin America: A key towards understanding changing family configurations. Genus, 69(3), 47–73.
Dammert, A. C. (2010). Siblings, child labor, and schooling in Nicaragua and Guatemala. Journal of Population Economics, 23(1), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-008-0237-0
du Bois-Reymond, M. (1998). ‘I don’t want to commit myself yet’: young people’s life concepts. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.1998.10592995
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2020). Latin America and the Caribbean Demographic Observatory, 2019. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210479578
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2021). CEPALSTAT databases and statistical publications. Retrieved September 20, 2021 from https://estadisticas.cepal.org/cepalstat/portada.html?idioma=english
Egan, P. G., Batz, R., Pauley, D., Gibbons, J. L., & Ashdown, B. K. (2014). Niños buenos vs niños malos: Etnoteorías de un grupo de madres guatemaltecas [Good children vs. bad children: Ethnotheories of a group of Guatemalan mothers]. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 183–193.
Encarnación, O. G. (2011). Latin America’s gay-rights revolution. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 104–118. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/latin-americas-gay-rights-revolution/
Flores, X., Gibbons, J. L., & Poelker, K. E. (2016). Fun and sexy, but less responsible: Guatemalan adolescents’ ideals 25 years later. Psychology and Developing Societies, 28(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333616657172
Forsberg, H., & Timonen, V. (2018). The future of the family as envisioned by young adults in Ireland. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(6), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1420761
Franzoni, J. M. (2021). Understanding the state regulation of fatherhood in Latin America: Complementary versus co-responsible. Journal of Latin American Studies, 53(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X2100047X
Gammage, S. (2010). Time pressed and time poor: Unpaid household work in Guatemala. Feminist Economics, 16(3), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2010.498571
Ganti, T. (2014). Neoliberalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155528
Gershon, I. (2011). “Neoliberal agency” [Special section: Keywords]. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1086/660866
Gibbons, J. L., & Luna, S. E. (2015). For men life is hard, for women life is harder: Gender roles in Central America. In S. Safdar & N. Kosakowska-Berezecka (Eds.), Psychology of gender through the lens of culture (pp. 307–325). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14005-6_15
Gibbons, J. L., Stiles, D. A., de la Garza Schnellmann, J., & Morales-Hidalgo, I. (1990). Images of work, gender, and social commitment among Guatemalan adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 10(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431690101006
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
Gómez-Urrutia, V., Paulina Royo, U., & Miguel Ángel Cruz, C. (2017). Imagining families: Gender, youth, and diversity in Chile. Affilia, 32(4), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109917718232
González Cabrera, C., & Papier, J. (2022, March 15). “Life and family” bill is a smokescreen for corruption in Guatemala. El Periódico. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/03/15/life-andfamily-bill-smokescreen-corruption-guatemala
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Haukanes, H., & Hašková, H. (2020). Gendered visions of family life and parenthood among Czech young people: Restricted or transforming imaginations? Journal of Youth Studies, 24(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1804054
Haukanes, H., & Heggli, G. (2016). Care and career in the life scripts of young people: Gendered cases from the Czech Republic and Norway. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 24(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2016.1242512
Heggli, G., Haukanes, H., & Tjomsland, M. (2013). Fearing the future? Young people envisioning their working lives in the Czech Republic, Norway and Tunisia. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(7), 916–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.766682
Human Rights Watch. (2021). “It’s what happens when you look like this”: Violence and discrimination against LGBT people in Guatemala. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/media_2021/03/“It’s What Happens When You Look Like This”_0.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). (2018). Resultados del censo nacional de población [Results of the national population census]. https://www.censopoblacion.gt/
Kitroeff, N., Lopez, O., & García, J. (2022, March 9). Guatemalan women face up to 10 years in prison under new abortion bill. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/09/world/americas/guatemala-abortion-prison.html
Landa Ugarte, A., Salazar, E., Quintana, M., & Herrera, M. R. (2018). USAID/Guatemala gender analysis final report September 2018 [Contract No.: AID-OAA-TO-17-00018]. United States Agency for International Development. Prepared by Banyan Global.
Lavrin, A. (1987). Women, the family, and social change in Latin America. World Affairs, 150(2), 109–128.
Lloyd, C. B., Grant, M., & Ritchie, A. (2008). Gender differences in time use among adolescents in developing countries: Implications of rising school enrollment rates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00552.x
Maupin, J., & Hackman, J. (2019). Reproductive preferences during middle childhood and early adolescence in Guatemala. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 21(6), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2018.1510545
Metz, B. E., & Webb, M. F. (2014). Historical sediments of competing gender models in indigenous Guatemala. In J. Gelfer (Ed.), Masculinities in a global era (International and cultural psychology, Vol 4., pp. 193–211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6931-5_11
Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Secretaría de Planificación y Programación de la Presidencia, and ICF International. (2017). VI encuesta nacional de salud materno infantil 2014-2015 [Informe final; VI national maternal and child health survey 2014–2015 (Final report)]. https://www.ine.gob.gt/images/2017/encuestas/ensmi2014_2015.pdf
Moore, J., Webb, M. F., Chary, A., Kraemer Díaz, A., & Rohloff, P. (2017). Aid and gendered subjectivity in rural Guatemala. The Journal of Development Studies, 53(12), 2164–2178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1274397
Ng, C., Haines-Saah, R. J., Hilario, C. T., Jenkins, E. K., & Johnson, J. L. (2016). Unpacking young people’s narratives about their aspirations: A Bourdieusian perspective. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 7(3-4), 423–455. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs734201616129
Olvera, C., & Luna, M. G. (2019, April 11–12). The spectrum of fatherhood in Latin American men. In P. Paoloni, M. Paoloni, & S. Arduini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on gender research, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy (pp. 735–741). ACPIL.
Patterson, L., & Forbes, K. (2012). ‘Doing gender’ in the imagined futures of young New Zealanders. Young, 20(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881202000201
Pearse, R., & Connell, R. (2016). Gender norms and the economy: Insights from social research. Feminist Economics, 22(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1078485
Poelker, K. E., & Gibbons, J. L. (2018). Guatemalan women achieve ideal family size: Empowerment through education and decision-making. Health Care for Women International, 39(2), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2017.1395028
Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., & Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88(2), 313–338.
Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. Taylor & Frances/Routledge. Ross, N. (2004). Culture and cognition: Implications for theory and method. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229713
Seginer, R. (2019). Adolescent future orientation: Does culture matter? Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1056
Sierra de Gamalero, D. C., Martinez, H., Martinez, B., Bernat, I., de los Angeles Diaz, M., Berti, S., & Gibbons, J. L. (2014). Creencias marianistas en diferentes generaciones de mujeres guatemaltecas [Marianist beliefs in different generations of Guatemalan women]. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 203–211.
Sletten, M. A. (2011). Limited expectations? How 14–16-year-old Norwegians in poor families look at their future. Young, 19(2), 181–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881001900204
Triandis, H. (2001). Collectivism: Cultural concerns. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 2227–2232). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04578-2
Türken, S., Nafstad, H. E., Phelps, J. M., & Blakar, R. M. (2016). Youth’s future orientation and well-being: Materialism and concerns with education and career among Turkish and Norwegian youth. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 7(3-4), 472–497. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs73-4201616175
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2018). Achieving gender equality in education: Don’t forget the boys [Policy paper 35]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000262714
Viveros, M., & Guttman, M. (2005). Masculinities in Latin America. Handbook of studies in men and masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Wehr, H., Chary, A., Webb, M. F., & Rohloff, P. (2014). Implications of gender and household roles in Indigenous Maya communities in Guatemala for child nutrition interventions [Research papers]. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 10(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijih.101201513196
Woodman, D. (2011). Young people and the future: Multiple temporal orientations shaped in interaction with significant others. Young, 19(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881001900201
Zartler, U. (2015). Children’s imagined future families: Relations between future constructions and present family forms in Austria. Childhood, 22(4), 520–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568214555889
Authors contributing to the International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Rights Granted After Publication
After publication, authors may reuse portions or the full article without obtaining formal permission for inclusion within their thesis or dissertation.
Permission for these reuses is granted on the following conditions:
- that full acknowledgement is made of the original publication stating the specific material reused [pages, figure numbers, etc.], [Title] by/edited by [Author/editor], [year of publication], reproduced by permission of International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies [link to IJCYFS website];
- In the case of joint-authored works, it is the responsibility of the author to obtain permission from co-authors for the work to be reuse/republished;
- that reuse on personal websites and institutional or subject-based repositories includes a link to the work as published in the International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies; and that the material is not distributed under any kind of Open Access style licences (e.g. Creative Commons) which may affect the Licence between the author and IJCYFS.