RESIDENTIAL CARE IN ISRAEL: PRINCIPLES FOR CONSTRUCTING A COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM FOR GATHERING DATA, PLANNING INTERVENTIONS, AND EVALUATING OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Hadas Shapira Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute
  • Anna Reznikovski-Kuras Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute
  • Tal Arazi Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs162-3202522518

Keywords:

out-of-home care, residential care, outcome thinking, computerized systems, shared measurement

Abstract

The project described here aimed to assist the Residential Placement Unit of the Ministry of Welfare and Social Affairs in developing tools for planning interventions for children in their care, monitoring activities and practices, and assessing outcomes. A major requirement was to ensure that the data produced would be relevant to field workers and support their daily therapeutic work with the children. The tools also facilitate ongoing follow-up on the children’s characteristics, needs, strengths, and prior interventions, including evaluating their effectiveness. This information is organized and can be presented in outputs tailored to the needs of field workers, supervisors, and policymakers. Key principles that guided the project were: collaboration among a multitiered team; involvement of service recipients and care leavers (“experts by experience”); balancing the needs of policymakers, staff and field workers; use of standardized and accepted terminology; reliance on a shared measurement framework; and use of outcome-based thinking to structure the system and its components. The implementation of such a computerized system often raises apprehension or resistance among both managers and staff. To address this, a lengthy and in-depth process of building trust took place, including training sessions that communicated the rationale behind the system’s development and the principles underlying its design, and the establishment of a structured feedback mechanism to assess the staff’s acceptance of the system. The system was successfully assimilated and is in routine use in all the residential care facilities of the Ministry of Welfare. Several factors were identified to explain this success: the commitment of the administration of the Residential Placement Unit to this project; the availability of an existing computerized system upon which to develop the project; and the involvement of the research team in the characterization of the system, training the staff, and refining and modifying the system based on the feedback received.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hadas Shapira, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute

Research Associate

Anna Reznikovski-Kuras, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute

Research Scholar

Tal Arazi, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute

Senior Research Scholar

References

Almog, Y., & Habib, J. (2013). Shared measurement of outcomes in the social sector [RR-646-13; Hebrew]. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute. https://brookdale.jdc.org.il/en/publication/shared-measurement-outcomes-social-sector/

Almog, Y., & Habib, J. (2014). A handbook for implementing shared measurement [S-142-14; Hebrew]. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute.

Alster, S., Habib, J, & Sabah, K. (2010). Developing the concept and practice of ongoing outcome measurement in service systems: Lessons and guidelines from relevant literature [Research report S-129-10]. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute. https://brookdale-web.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2018/01/129-10-OutcomeMeasurement-WEB-ENG.pdf

Arazi, T., & Namer-Furstenberg, R. (2020). The integrative guide to outcome-based thinking [Hebrew]. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute.

Beresford, P. (2007). The role of service user research in generating knowledge-based health and social care: From conflict to contribution. Evidence & Policy, 3(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426407781738074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426407781738074

Borkman, T. (1976). Experiential knowledge: A new concept for the analysis of self-help groups. Social Service Review, 50(3), 445–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/643401

Budde, S., Mayer, S., Zinn, A., Lippold, M. A., Avrushin, A., Bromberg, A., Goerge, R., & Courtney, M. E. (2004). Residential care in Illinois: Trends and alternatives [Final report]. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.

Carrilio, T. E. (2008). Accountability, evidence, and the use of information systems in social service programs. Journal of Social Work 8(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017307088495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017307088495

Centre for Regional Development and McCaughey Centre. (2007). Community indicators Victoria: A resource guide using CIV as a tool for council planning. Swinburne University.

Dale, N., Baker, A. J., Anastasio, E., & Purcell, J. (2007). Characteristics of children in residential treatment in New York State. Child Welfare, 86(1), 5-27.

Dearman, P. (2005). Computerized social casework recording: Autonomy and control in Australia’s income support agency. Labor Studies Journal 30(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X0503000104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lab.2005.0026

Dolev, T., Ben-Rabi, D., & Zemach-Marom, T. (2009). Residential care for children at risk in Israel. In M. E. Courtney & D. Iwaniec (Eds.), Residential care of children: Comparative perspectives (pp. 72–88). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309188.003.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309188.003.0005

Horgan, A., Manning, F., Donovan, M. O., Doody, R., Savage, E., Bradley, S. K., Dorrity, C., O’Sullivan, H., Goodwin, J., Greaney, S., Biering, P., Bjornsson, E., Bocking, J., Russell, S., MacGabhann, L., Griffin, M., van der Vaart, K. J., Allon, J., Granerud, A., … & Happell, B. (2020). Expert by experience involvement in mental health nursing education: The co‐production of standards between experts by experience and academics in mental health nursing. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 27(5), 553–562.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12605

Huuskonen, S., & Vakkari, P. (2010). Client information system as an everyday information tool in child protection work. IIiX ’10: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1840784.1840788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1840784.1840788

Jones, M., & Pietilä, I. (2020). Personal perspectives on patient and public involvement: Stories about becoming and being an expert by experience. Sociology of Health & Illness, 42(4), 809–824.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13064

Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review 9(1), 36–41. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact

Kramer, M., Parkhurst, M., & Vaidyanathan, L. (2009). Breakthroughs in shared measurement and social impact. FSG Social Impact Advisors.

Liedgren, P., Elvhage, G., Ehrenberg, A., & Kullberg, C. (2016). The use of decision support systems in social work: A scoping study literature review. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2014.914992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2014.914992

Martin, G. P. (2008). Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management. Social Science & Medicine, 67(11), 1757–1765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.024

Ministry of Labor, Social Affairs and Social Services. (2017). Annual Report 67B: Children and youth at risk in the Ministry of Welfare’s boarding schools (pp. 719–761; Hebrew).

Ógáin, E. N., Svistak, M., & de Las Casas, L. (2013). Blueprint for shared measurement: Developing, designing and implementing shared approaches to impact measurement. Inspiring Impact & NPC.

Oldfield, P., Hall, H., Rawson, J., & Harvey, M. (2015). Case management systems for social service sector organisations. New Zealand Ministry of Social Development & Infoxchange.

Rodin, J., & MacPherson, N. (2012). Shared outcomes: How the Rockefeller Foundation is approaching evaluation with developing country partners. Stanford Social Innovation Review Summer 2012, 12–15.

Schmid, H. (2006). Report of the Public Committee to Examine the Situation of Children and Teenagers at Risk and in Distress [Hebrew]. The State of Israel.

Sher, N., & Arazi, T. (2016). “Outcome-Based Thinking” at the Organizational Level [Hebrew]. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute.

Sher, N., & Arazi, T. (2017). Information management systems in social services: Insights and guidelines for the development of systems supporting outcome oriented management & practice [RR-745-17; Hebrew]. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute. https://brookdale.jdc.org.il/en/publication/information-management-systems-social-services/

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, November 20, 1989. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

Walker, K. E., Farley, C., & Polin, M. (2012). Using data in multi-agency collaborations: Guiding performance to ensure accountability and improve programs. Public/Private Ventures. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/using-data-multi-agency-collaborations-guiding-performance-ensure

White, S., Wastell, D., Broadhurst, K., & Hall, C. (2010). When policy o’erleaps itself: The ‘tragic tale’ of the Integrated Children’s System. Critical Social Policy, 30(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018310367675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018310367675

Downloads

Published

2025-10-20

How to Cite

Shapira, H., Reznikovski-Kuras, A., & Arazi, T. (2025). RESIDENTIAL CARE IN ISRAEL: PRINCIPLES FOR CONSTRUCTING A COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM FOR GATHERING DATA, PLANNING INTERVENTIONS, AND EVALUATING OUTCOMES. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 16(2-3), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs162-3202522518

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2-3 (2025): Special issue based on papers presented at the FICE-International 35th World Congress Split, Croatia, October 23–25, 2024

Section

Section II - Learning from the Voices of Young People, Families, & Practitioners

License

Authors contributing to the International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.

Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Rights Granted After Publication

After publication, authors may reuse portions or the full article without obtaining formal permission for inclusion within their thesis or dissertation. 

Permission for these reuses is granted on the following conditions:

  • that full acknowledgement is made of the original publication stating the specific material reused [pages, figure numbers, etc.], [Title] by/edited by [Author/editor], [year of publication], reproduced by permission of International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies [link to IJCYFS website];
  • In the case of joint-authored works, it is the responsibility of the author to obtain permission from co-authors for the work to be reuse/republished;
  • that reuse on personal websites and institutional or subject-based repositories includes a link to the work as published in the International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies; and that the material is not distributed under any kind of Open Access style licences (e.g. Creative Commons) which may affect the Licence between the author and IJCYFS.