UNDERSTANDING THE UNKNOWN: WORK DISCUSSION AS A MEANS OF DEVELOPING CASE-UNDERSTANDING COMPETENCIES
Abstract
In the context of academic training for social educators in Vienna, increasing emphasis is being placed on supporting the development of core competencies with a focus on forming a detailed appreciation of the client’s situation — “case understanding”. The method of Work Discussion described in this article is based on a psychodynamic theory founded in the psychoanalytic tradition. It enables seminar groups to reflect on, and think in a differentiated manner about, interactions and relationship dynamics between people in psychosocial fields of work. The article introduces key ideas on the professionalism of social pedagogical professionals and explains common theories of professionalization in this research field. Using the example of Work Discussion, I elaborate characteristics of psychodynamically oriented professionalization in academic education and training for social work professionals. The final part of the article is a discussion of how psychodynamically oriented professionalism could facilitate a transformation in professional practice.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bion, W. R. (2022). Lernen durch Erfahrung [Learning through experience;10th ed.]. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.
Datler, W., & Datler, M. (2014). Was ist „Work Discussion“? Über die Arbeit mit Praxisprotokollen nach dem Tavistockkonzept [What is “work discussion”? The discussion of reported work situations according to the Tavistock Model]. https://services.phaidra.univie.ac.at/api/object/o:368997/preview
Datler, W., & Stephenson, T. (1999). Tiefenpsychologische Ansätze in der Psychotherapie [Depth psychological approaches in psychotherapy]. In T. Slunecko & G. Sonneck (Eds.), Einführung in die Psychotherapie (pp. 77–139). Facultas/UTB.
Finger-Trescher, U. (2012). Psychoanalytisch-pädagogisches Können und die Funktion gruppenanalytischer Selbsterfahrung [Psychoanalytic-pedagogical skills and the function of group-analytic self-experience]. In W. Datler, U. Finger-Trescher, & J. Gstach (Eds.), Jahrbuch für Psychoanalytische Pädagogik: Vol. 20. Psychoanalytisch-pädagogisches Können: Vermitteln - Aneignen - Anwenden (pp. 34–52). Psychosozial-Verlag.
Freud, S. (2000). Ratschläge für den Arzt bei der psychoanalytischen Behandlung [Advice for the doctor in psychoanalytic treatment]. In A. Mitscherlich, A. Richards, & J. Strachey (Eds.), Sigmund Freud Studienausgabe: Ergänzungsband. Schriften zur Behandlungstechnik (pp. 169–180). Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag. (Original work published 1912)
Gahleitner, S. B. (2020). Soziale Arbeit als Beziehungsprofession [Social work as a relationship profession]. In B. Völter, H. Cornel, S. B. Gahleitner, & S. Voß (Eds.), Professionsverständnisse in der Sozialen Arbeit (pp. 101–109). Beltz Juventa.
Gahleitner, S. B., Hahn, G., & Gremser, R. (Eds.). (2013). Psychosoziale Diagnostik [Psychosocial diagnostics]. Psychiatrie Verlag.
Harris, M. (1987). The Tavistock training and philosophy. In M. H. Williams (Ed.), Collected papers of Martha Harris and Esther Bick (pp. 259–282). The Clunie Press.
Heiner, M. (2012). Handlungskompetenz „Fallverstehen“. In R. Becker-Lenz, S. Busse, G. Ehlert, & S. Müller-Hermann (Eds.), Professionalität Sozialer Arbeit und Hochschule: Wissen, Kompetenz, Habitus und Identität im Studium Sozialer Arbeit (pp. 201–217). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94246-9_11
Heiner, M. (2013). Wege zu einer integrativen Grundlagendiagnostik in der Sozialen Arbeit [Paths to integrative basic diagnostics in social work]. In S. B. Gahleitner, G. Hahn, & R. Gremser (Eds.), Psychosoziale Diagnostik (pp. 18–34). Psychiatrie Verlag.
Kent, B. (2014). Social work supervision in practice: The Commonwealth and International Library: Social work division. Elsevier Science. http://gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1879390
LeCroy, C. W. (Ed.). (2014). Case studies in social work practice (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Müller, B. (2017). Sozialpädagogisches Können: Ein Lehrbuch zur multiperspektivischen Fallarbeit [Social pedagogical skills: A textbook on multi-perspective casework]. Lambertus-Verlag.
Nauerth, M. (2016). Verstehen in der Sozialen Arbeit: Handlungstheoretische Beiträge zur Logik sozialer Diagnostik. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10075-9
Obholzer, A., & Roberts, V. Z. (Eds.). (2019). The unconscious at work: A Tavistock approach to making sense of organizational life (2nd Ed.). Routledge.
Oevermann, U. (2009). Die Problematik der Strukturlogik des Arbeitsbündnisses und der Dynamik von Übertragung und Gegenübertragung in einer professionalisierten Praxis von Sozialarbeit [The problem of the structural logic of the working alliance and the dynamics of transference and countertransference in a professionalized practice of social work]. In R. Becker-Lenz, S. Busse, G. Ehlert, & S. Müller (Eds.), Professionalität in der Sozialen Arbeit: Standpunkte, Kontroversen, Perspektiven (1st ed., pp. 113–142). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91896-9_6
Oevermann, U. (2023). Theoretische Skizze einer revidierten Theorie professionalisierten Handelns [Theoretical outline of a revised theory of professionalized action]. In A. Combe & W. Helsper (Eds.), Pädagogische Professionalität: Untersuchungen zum Typus pädagogischen Handelns (10th ed., pp. 70–182). Suhrkamp Taschenbuch. (Original work published 1996)
Schön, D. A. (1995). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
Ruch, G., Turney, D., & Ward, A. (Eds.). (2018). Relationship-based social work: Getting to the heart of practice (2nd ed.). Jessica Kingsley. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6268804
Rustin, M. (2019). Work discussion: Some historical and theoretical observations. In M. Rustin & J. Bradley (Eds.), Work discussion: Learning from reflective practice in work with children and families (pp. 3–21). Routledge.
Würker, A. (2022). „Szenisches Verstehen“: Die Bedeutung eines psychoanalytischen Konzepts für die psychoanalytische Pädagogik [“Scenic Understanding”: The significance of a psychoanalytic concept for psychoanalytic pedagogy]. In J. Gstach, B. Neudecker, & K. Trunkenpolz (Eds.), Psychoanalytische Pädagogik zwischen Theorie und Praxis: Festschrift für Wilfried Datler (pp. 165–189). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38751-8_9
Authors contributing to the International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Rights Granted After Publication
After publication, authors may reuse portions or the full article without obtaining formal permission for inclusion within their thesis or dissertation.
Permission for these reuses is granted on the following conditions:
- that full acknowledgement is made of the original publication stating the specific material reused [pages, figure numbers, etc.], [Title] by/edited by [Author/editor], [year of publication], reproduced by permission of International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies [link to IJCYFS website];
- In the case of joint-authored works, it is the responsibility of the author to obtain permission from co-authors for the work to be reuse/republished;
- that reuse on personal websites and institutional or subject-based repositories includes a link to the work as published in the International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies; and that the material is not distributed under any kind of Open Access style licences (e.g. Creative Commons) which may affect the Licence between the author and IJCYFS.
