Regulation of Madness in Early Childhood Education: Exploring Undergraduates’ Understanding of Professional Identity and Mental Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs511202622323Keywords:
postsecondary early childhood education, child studies, sanism, Mad studies, madness, mental healthAbstract
This qualitative study investigates how sanist systems of oppression within early childhood education both reflect and reinforce dominant discourses on mental health and madness. Through a Mad studies analysis of both qualitative interview data with postsecondary early childhood education and child studies students, as well as policy and curriculum documents relevant to Ontario postsecondary early childhood education studies, we seek to disrupt taken-for-granted assumptions and create space for mental difference. This study was conducted with 25 postsecondary early childhood education and child studies students, with the data analyzed using both Foucauldian and institutional ethnographic methods. Ultimately, this study illustrates how madness and Mad educators are constructed as a potential harm to the profession, reinforcing sanist forms of discrimination against educators with mental health differences.
Downloads
References
Adam, S. (2017). Crazy making: The institutional relations of undergraduate nursing in the reproduction of biomedical psychiatry. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2017-0071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2017-0071
Adam, S., Gold, E., & Tsui, J. (2024). Critical ethnography and its others: Entanglement of matter/meaning/madness. Nursing Inquiry, 31(1), e12576. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12576
Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392781
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Andrew, Y. (2015). What we feel and what we do: Emotional capital in early childhood work. Early Years, 35(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2015.1077206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2015.1077206
Barton, K. (2023). An inquiry into the mental health and well-being of early childhood educators who have worked within the contemporary Ontarian early learning and child care context [Master’s thesis, University of Guelph]. University of Guelph Theses & Dissertations. https://hdl.handle.net/10214/27559
Beresford, P. (2020). “Mad,” Mad studies, and advancing inclusive resistance. Disability & Society, 35(8), 1337–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1692168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1692168
Beresford, P., & Russo, J. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge international handbook of Mad studies. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429465444
Berman, R., Abawi, Z., Haile, F., Escayg, K., Butler, A., Royer, N., & Daniel, B.-J. (2021). Give race its place: An anti-racism knowledge sharing initiative for early childhood educators in Ontario. EceLINK, 6(1), 42–54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361447322_Give_Race_Its_Place_An_Anti-racism_Knowledge-sharing_Initiative_for_Early_Childhood_Educators_in_Ontario
Bertrand, J., & Gestwicki, C. (2015). Essentials of early childhood education. Cengage Learning Canada Inc.
Best Start Expert Panel on Early Learning. (2007). Early learning for every child today: Framework for Ontario early childhood settings. Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews (2nd ed.). SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716665
Burstow, B. (2015). Psychiatry and the business of madness: An ethical and epistemological accounting. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503855
Cabanas, E., & Illouz, E. (2019). Manufacturing happy citizens: How the science and industry of happiness control our lives. John Wiley & Sons.
Chang-Kredl, S., & Kingsley, S. (2014). Identity expectations in early childhood teacher education: Pre-service teachers’ memories of prior experiences and reasons for entry into the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.05.005
Chapman, C. (2013). Cultivating a troubled consciousness: Compulsory sound-mindedness and complicity in oppression. Health, Culture, and Society, 5(1), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.5195/hcs.2013.140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/hcs.2013.140
Creed, B. (1993). The monstrous feminine: Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Davies, A. (2022). Professional ruptures in pre-service ECEC: Maddening early childhood education and care. Curriculum Inquiry, 52(5), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2022.2149027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2022.2149027
Davies, A. W. (2023). Maddening pre-service early childhood education and care through poetics: Dismantling epistemic injustice through Mad autobiographical poetics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 24(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491231155555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491231155555
Davies, A., & Hoskin, R.A. (2021). Using femme theory to foster a feminine-inclusive early childhood education and care practice. In Z. Abawi, A. Eizadirad, & R. Berman (Eds.), Equity as praxis in early childhood education and care (pp. 107-126). Canadian Scholars Press.
Davies, A., Brewer, K., & Shay, B. (2022). Sanism in early childhood education and care: Cultivating space for madness and Mad educators. EceLINK, 6(1), 18–30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361338042_Sanism_in_Early_Childhood_Education_and_Care_Cultivating_Space_for_Madness_and_Mad_Educators_in_ECEC
Davies, A. W., Watson, D., Armstrong, B., Spring, L., Brewer, K. C., Shay, B., ... & Adam, S. (2022). Exploring histories of ECEC to reconceptualize “normalcy” through Mad studies: A critical proposition for early childhood education and care post-secondary programs. EceLINK, 6(2), 20–38. https://www.aeceo.ca/peer_reviewed_articles
Douglas, P., Runswick-Cole, K., Ryan, S., & Fogg, P. (2021). Mad mothering: Learning from the intersections of madness, mothering, and disability. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 15(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2021.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2021.3
Fairchild, N., & Mikuska, E. (2021). Emotional labor, ordinary affects, and the early childhood education and care worker. Gender, Work, & Organization, 28(3), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12663
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. Original work published 1977.
Gillis, A. (2015, November 3). The rise of Mad studies. University Affairs Magazine. k https://www.universityaffairs.ca/features/feature-article/mad-studies/
Gorman, R., & LeFrançois, B. A. (2017). Mad studies. In B. Cohen (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of critical mental health (pp. 107–114). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315399584-14
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
Ingriselli, J., & Schempp, K. (2019). The importance of early childhood educator mental health & well-being: A guide to supporting educators. Canadian Mental Health Association.
Johnston, L., Shoemaker, L., Land, N., Di Santo, A., & Jagger, S. (2020). Early childhood education and care in Canada. In G. W. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1473
Langford, R. (2006). Discourses of the good early childhood educator in professional training: Reproducing marginality or working toward social change? International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, and Practice: Reconceptualizing Childhood Studies, 7(1), 115–125. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ795122.pdf
Langford, R. (2007). Who is a good early childhood educator? A critical study of differences within a universal professional identity in early childhood education preparation programs. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 28(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020701686609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020701686609
Langford, R. (2008). Making a difference in the lives of young children: A critical analysis of a pedagogical discourse for motivating young women to become early childhood educators. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 31(1), 78–101. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/2993/0
LeFrançois, B., Menzies, R., & Reaume, G. (Eds.). (2013). Mad matters: A critical reader in Canadian Mad studies. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
LeFrançois, B. A., & Voronka, J. (2022). Mad epistemologies and maddening the ethics of knowledge production. In T. Macias (Ed.), Un/ethical un/knowing: Ethical reflections on methodology and politics in social science research (pp. 105–130). Fernwood.
Lloyd, C. E., & Finn, M. D. (2017). Authenticity, validation and sexualisation on Grindr: An analysis of trans women’s accounts. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(1-2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2017.1316769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2017.1316769
McCuaig, K., Akbari, E., & Correia, A. (2022, April). Canada’s children need a professional early childhood education workforce. Atkinson Centre for Society and Child Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64628/AAM.rpjvqssqj
Moss, P. (2017). Power and resistance in early childhood education: From dominant discourse to democratic experimentalism. Journal of Pedagogy, 8(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2017-0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2017-0001
Ontario College of Early Childhood Educators. (2017). Code of ethics and standards of practice. https://www.college-ece.ca/en/documents/code_and_standards_2017.pdf
Ontario College of Early Childhood Educators. (2021). Program portfolio for approval of education programs. https://www.college-ece.ca/en/Documents/Approval_of_Education_Programs_Post-Secondary_Program_Application_Portfolio_EN.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). How does learning happen?: Ontario’s pedagogy for early years. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/childcare/HowLearningHappens.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges, and Universities. (2018). Early childhood education program standard. http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/pepg/audiences/colleges/progstan/humserv/51211-early-childhood-education.pdf
Poole, J., & Grant, Z. (2018). When youth get mad through a critical course on mental health. In S. Pashang, N. Khanlou, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Today’s youth and mental health (pp. 305–320). Springer International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64838-5_17
Procknow, G. (2024). A literature review of Mad studies as critical pedagogy: What is Mad studies, and how does it implicate the education of adults? New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 36(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225231216231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225231216231
Rodéhn, C. (2024). Mad studies as a methodology for critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 30(8), 954–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2024.2363817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2024.2363817
Russell, V. T. (2010). Queer teachers’ ethical dilemmas regarding queer youth. Teaching Education, 21(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476211003735427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10476211003735427
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Northeastern University Press.
Smith, D. E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Northeastern University Press.
Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442683747
Smith, D. E. (2001). Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Studies in Cultures, Organizations, and Societies, 7, 159–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10245280108523557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10245280108523557
Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Rowman & Littlefield. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216409632
Smith, D. E. (2006). Incorporating texts into ethnographic practice. In D. E. Smith (Ed.), Institutional ethnography as practice (pp. 65–88). Rowman & Littlefield. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216402855.ch-0004
Smith, D. E., & Griffith, A. I. (2022). Simply institutional ethnography: Creating a sociology for people. University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487528072
Stein, R., Garay, M., & Nguyen, A. (2024). It matters: Early childhood mental health, educator stress, and burnout. Early Childhood Education Journal, 52(2), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01438-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01438-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adam Davies, Cameron Greensmith, Lauren Spring, Simon Adam, Brooke Richardson, Carla Rice, Olga Smoliak, Nidhi Menon, Alexander Purnell, John Beaton
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the Journal of Childhood Studies agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
